Wednesday, May 7, 2025

Some Common Fears We Writers Share.




 The awesome co-hosts for the May 7 posting of the IWSG are Feather Stone, Janet Alcorn, Rebecca Douglass, Jemima Pett, and Pat Garcia!

Every month, we announce a question that members can answer in their IWSG post. These questions may prompt you to share advice, insight, a personal experience or story. Include your answer to the question in your IWSG post or let it inspire your post if you are struggling with something to say.

Remember, the question is optional!

May 7 question - Some common fears writers share are rejection, failure, success, and lack of talent or ability. What are your greatest fears as a writer? How do you manage them?

When I first started writing for publication, I could write “all of the above,” but that’s not true anymore. 

I don’t fear rejection. I just don’t like it.  When it happens, I find a safe place to hang out for a while, then I set out again.

morguefile


I haven’t failed because I'm still writing and publishing, so I can’t fear that. 

Too much success? Is that possible? 

But now we get to something that does keep me on the ropes. There are times I’m sure I’ll never write the story I want to because I don’t have the talent or ability, and I'll add knowledge because that's a huge chunk of what writing well is all about. I’m dealing with a lack of knowledge right now as I work on a new story that I want to write. 

morguefile


The problem is I keep running into barriers—gaps in what I know. My only recourse is to fall back on research, so I’m not making a lot of progress on the book, but my knowledge base has increased in several different areas: maritime research, cybersecurity, and Alaska. I've even learned how to make a wireless telegraph and a smoke bomb. You never know when you're going to need some of those.

I read a post by Jacqui Murray on research that inspired me to continue my efforts to learn as much about my topic as possible. You might enjoy reading her POST, if you haven't already.

If I manage to successfully combine all that I've learned into a cohesive story, I hope to come up with something that people will want to read. I'll probably be posting about this newest challenge for a while.

Now, I'm off to see how other members have answered this month's question. 

Have a wonderful May!



Monday, April 28, 2025

Reflections on Good Writing and Good Writers

What makes good writing, and how do I become a better writer?  
If you are a writer you have likely considered these questions.
Certainly I have, as a writer and as a teacher of writing for many years.

Surely writing is one of the most complex things we do as humans,
and pinning down what makes good writing
is as slippery as trying to catch a pollywog in a stream.

We know good writing when we see it, but understanding what it is
and applying that understanding to improve our writing is an ongoing challenge.

Not everyone takes up that challenge the way that writers do.
Many people learn enough to be proficient writers
for their chosen path in life, plumber or phlebotomist.
And that's okay.  It's practical and proactive.
But for those of us who have chosen to write, that challenge is a lifelong passion.

Morning Pages
Aurora, Colorado, USA
June 29, 2024
© M. Louise (MacBeath) Barbour/Fundy Blue. All Rights Reserved

Do you remember the childhood magic of discovering
that you could make marks on paper and tell a story?
Few of us do because we were so young, perhaps as young as when we were toddlers.
I don't remember a time that I couldn't read or write,
but I have spent enough time in the company of young children
to see the wonder and delight in their eyes when they realize 
they can tell a story by making marks on paper with pencils, crayons, or markers.
I think storytelling must lie at the heart of what it is to be human. 

Just Scribbles?
This is my sister Bertie's earliest preserved writing at 2 years and 3 months old.
Lac Seul, Ontario, Canada
Circa June 1961
© M. Louise (MacBeath) Barbour/Fundy Blue. All Rights Reserved

At its simplest writing is visibly forming symbols
on a surface to communicate thoughts and ideas.
Whether it was a prehistoric man scratching with charcoal on a rock wall 
a Sumerian pressing a reed stylus into damp clay,
a Medieval scribe putting quill to parchment, 
or a contemporary person writing with a ballpoint pen on a notepad
or thumbing words into an iPhone,
humans have been compelled to communicate and to preserve their thoughts and ideas.

These intentions often start when we are very young.
Just scribbles?  
Take another look at my sister Bertie's earliest preserved writing,
a letter to our father.
Perhaps you missed the face, the body, or the arms holding something.
I was stunned when the scribbles first resolved into a definite image for me many years later.

Twenty-seven-month-old Bertie worked very hard on the middle section of her letter, 
and I am convinced that the person is holding our dachshund Gretchen in his or her arms.
I can see Gretchen's nose, eye, ear, and front paws.
Of course, as a reader, I am bringing my knowledge and ideas to her story,
but that is what readers do.

Bertie grew up to become a teacher,
but also the author of two published books, one fiction and the other nonfiction.
The intention to tell a story was innate in her, as it is for many writers.

Author Roberta (Bertie) Heembrock Shares Her Book Oscar the Herring Gull with Penny Graham
Penny has been a friend of our family for over 50 years.
She owns Mariner Cruises, a popular whale-watching business on Brier Island in Nova Scotia.
On the Bay of Fundy out of Westport, Nova Scotia, Canada 
July 31, 2014
© M. Louise (MacBeath) Barbour/Fundy Blue. All Rights Reserved

When we write we have the intention of communicating effectively.
The general consensus is that good writing includes structural and stylistic components,
with an additional literary component if the writing is creative. 

As writers we want to connect with our chosen audience in a meaningful way.
We want to engage readers, impact them, make them remember our writing,
whatever form it takes.

Good writing also has an emotional component, especially in creative fiction or nonfiction.
Connecting with an audience emotionally
makes writing more compelling, meaningful, and memorable.

Some might argue that Bertie's scribbles aren't true writing, 
because she is not using a recognizable language and its conventions.
Perhaps, but for its intended audience, my father, 
Bertie's scribbles would have had a lasting emotional impact.
He was flying around Northern Ontario in bush planes visiting remote Indian schools,
while my mother, we five, and Gretchen were living in a fish camp on Lac Seul.
Our father missed us terribly and was dreadfully lonely.

Portrait with Fish
Barbie, Me with my arm around Bertie, Roy, and Donnie
with three lake trout
Two Point, Lac Seul, Ontario, Canada 
Late June 1961 
© M. Louise (MacBeath) Barbour/Fundy Blue. All Rights Reserved



Gretchen with Roy, Me, Mom and Bertie
We don't have a lot of photos from this time ~ Film was expensive to buy and to process.
Attawapiskat Lake, Northern Ontario, Canada 
Early June 1961
© M. Louise (MacBeath) Barbour/Fundy Blue. All Rights Reserved

It is the emotional impact of Bertie's "story" that makes it unforgettable for me,
long after the death of my parents and our beloved Gretchen.
It makes toddler Bertie as vivid and alive to me as current Bertie. 
I would argue that her "writing" was compelling, meaningful, and memorable;
good writing.

As an IWSG Admin I have been given this platform to post on now and in the future.
My intention for new posts is to look more closely
at some of the elements of effective writing and how writers can become better writers.

What do you think makes good writing?
How do you work on becoming a better writer?
I look forward to hearing your thoughts in the comments. 




Till next time ~
Fundy Blue.

 





Monday, April 21, 2025

How to Research When All You Have is Bones and Dirt


Thank you for inviting me to your blog today, Alex, to talk about how I research. I love researching a new book almost as much as writing it, but this is the first time I’ve explained how I do that. Let me know in comments if I miss anything.

Most authors flesh out stories by reading other books or visiting digital and physical sites, but my stories occur in a time before the written word or oral stories, up to 1.8 million years ago. Events from those ancient time frames are mostly rough guesses based on whatever artifacts survived the ravages of time. Nothing preserves about the characters’ dreams, passions, inspirations, or emotions, how they handled illness, worried about threats from vicious predators, or solved problems. For a fiction story, I need to know about family, community, culture, but bones, dirt, and rocks tell little about those. As a result, the story I first wrote was more textbook than life.

It took me a long time and much outside-the-box thinking to answer the questions that would breathe life into my characters. Here’s how I did it:

• I explored the great names in my topic.
I read everything written by topical experts like the Leakey’s, Donald Johanson, Desmond Morris, Ian Tattersall, and Christopher Wills. Each time I came to a question they couldn't answer, I dug deeper, found new experts. For example, (see below), answers about counting from experts didn’t satisfy me so I read the amazing Lev Vygotsky as he explained how different societies did or didn't use numbers and counting.

• I explored academic resources like JSTOR, Google Scholar, university libraries.
At first, the words and phraseology of papers from places like the Library of Congress and the University of Notre Dame sounded foreign, but eventually, I demystified the language. Once learned, it didn’t change.

• I visited museum websites (like the Smithsonian) for early man collections
Not just one—as many as I could access. Each has its own take on evolution with varied shading and nuances. After exploring a dozen (or more), I distilled a personal understanding that breathed life into my story.

• I read raw data from archaeological digs.
It’s easy to rely on a researcher’s opinions in his published work, but I wanted the raw data so I could peek behind the curtain, draw my own conclusions. In my case, this was archeological digs like East Africa's Olduvai Gorge, South Africa's Rising Star cave system, China's Dragon Bones, and many more. 1.8 million year old remains were primarily skeletons, tools, scat, and the animal bones around them, but these told me a lot about my characters’ health and diet, communities, and more. An example is these remains never included pottery which meant berries and water must have been collected in gourds, skulls, or the intestinal sacks of large animals.

• I didn’t just seek answers to questions. I sought understanding.
For example, I wanted to know the food Neanderthals ate. Scientists provided clues from what they found in teeth and bones, what was indigenous to the land, how climatic changes drove early man one direction or another, animal routes based on land bridges that came and went. I kept at it until a picture formed in my mind of the characters' lives, what inspired their movements, what shaped their decisions. Was it herds? Water? Or maybe a search for salt?

• I became them.
When writing about our oldest human species, Homo habilis, though they are extinct, their evolutionary predecessors (chimpanzees and Great Apes) remain much unchanged today. I postulated that understanding these creatures would bring sense to earliest man. So I read everything about them from the authorities like Jane Goodall, Birute Galdikas, and Dian Fossey.
Additionally, my early man characters were primarily hunter-gathers, so I explored living tribes who still practice that way of life. I read everything possible about the San, Pirahã, Pygmies, the American Indians (OK--no longer hunter gatherers, but much is written about their early lifestyle). I spent hours--days--watching videos, walking in their footsteps, hunting for food and digging up roots with them, finding water where there seemed to be none.

• I made myself aware of their surroundings.
For example, necklaces and wall paintings didn't exist in man's evolution until Neanderthals arrived. Then, something in their brains made it important to string teeth and feathers around their necks and paint symbols on the walls of their caves. It was intriguing that they'd evolved as a genus to consider those important (for reasons we don't yet know).
“The content presented in this blog are the result of creative imagination and not intended for use, reproduction, or incorporation into any artificial intelligence training or machine learning systems without prior written consent from the author.”

• Google Earth has a time slider that will take you back 100 years into the past so you can see what the land looks like. This didn’t work for me, but if you're writing about that era, it is a boon.

Overall, researching what will primarily be raw data is both exhausting and exciting, challenging and gratifying. I would always choose to find my own connections over using someone else's.



Jacqui Murray
is the author of the popular prehistoric fiction saga, Man vs. Nature which explores seminal events in man’s evolution one trilogy at a time. She is also author of the Rowe-Delamagente thrillers and Building a Midshipman , the story of her daughter’s journey from high school to United States Naval Academy. Her non-fiction includes 100+ books on tech into education, reviews as an Amazon Vine Voice and a freelance journalist on tech ed topics.
Find Jacqui - Amazon, blog, Pinterest X, and website


Badlands:
Print, digital, audio
Badlands trailer